No doubt, the word "Haq" is used in different meanings in the dictionary. For example, to be proved, to be true, to be obligatory, to be appropriate, permissible, and necessary etc. This definition is close to the literal meaning only .Hence, the researchers claim that the scholars did not provide a comprehensive definition of right that includes all its forms. Some were satisfied because the meaning of right was clear to them, so they did not think it necessary to define, or because they did not apply the right to any single meaning, but continued to apply the right to different issues in different jurisprudential chapters. Sometimes it is applied to something that is proved for a person, whether it is financial or non-financial. This article will try to highlight all these issues are taken up and analyzed in the light of opinions of various schools of thought.

Keywords: Obligatory, appropriate, permissible, literal and opinions